Our review proceeds from three key assumptions:
1) Because "photos always turn out much better when you have a camera on hand to take the picture," pocket-friendly cameras offer significant advantages over bigger DSLRs; and
2) These days, most point-and-shoots offer pretty good image quality; and
3) The most significant differentiator between point-and-shoot cameras is ease-of-use, as dictated by the design of the camera's user interface (tactile feel, switch positioning, screen menus, etc).
So which camera won our point-and-shoot shootout? Read all about it!
LINK:
Finding the Right Point-and-Shoot Camera (New York Times camera review by Todd Lappin.)
Just read this article in the New York Times. It's great to see someone make a connection between ease of use and camera performance when reviewing cameras. This is also an example where the argument can't really be made that the user will just figure it out and ease of use won't have an effect over time. Just think how many times we've all handed our cameras over to a friend/stranger to take a group photo only to realize later that it was completely botched? Yes, usability is still important...
-CT
http://www.mauronewmedia.com/blog
Posted by: Cianna Timbers | 12 February 2009 at 01:08 PM
Congrats on being published in the NYT!
Posted by: Evan | 12 February 2009 at 02:22 PM
My biggest concern when getting a camera is that it takes a normal memory format (SDHC these days) rather then propitiatory ones (so that eliminated sony right off the bat, and I have never being a fan of internal memory)
Also taking a standard miniUSB cable is a feature that makes great ease of use since everyone has several, whereas the propitiatory cables are always left behind - that's also a great case against the internal memory since you cant pull it out and put it in another device if the cameras flat or you have left the cable.
and turn on to shoot delay - that's horrible on some cameras - I used a friends one in the past that was at least 5 seconds from turn on just to let it do its little beeping tune on turn on before it even started to think about doing anything, whereas my old canon A460 is good to go in about 2.
The one thing I hate about my canon is that it has no option for mass storage mode, so I dont get a drive letter with the photos on it when I connect it to a computer
Posted by: Richard | 12 February 2009 at 05:12 PM
I want a camera where I can actually see what I'm taking a picture of in bright sunlight. Do any of these qualify?
Posted by: Virginia Postrel | 13 February 2009 at 11:11 PM
I think only SLR digital camera able to let you taking picture of in bright sunlight.
Posted by: jeremy | 07 June 2009 at 01:05 AM
Just read this article in the New York Times. It's great to see someone make a connection between ease of use and camera performance when reviewing cameras.
Posted by: gaia gold | 29 June 2009 at 08:29 PM
I have nice camera in my mobilephone, but i always like to take snaps from my digital camera. It's very light weight and easy to use. Best among all autofocus.
Posted by: Lisa | 27 August 2009 at 12:43 PM
Hi,
Very useful information for future generation. Thanks for sharing such an informative post. Keep posting
Posted by: Cheapest game prices | 17 December 2009 at 05:43 AM
Hi,
Very useful information for future generation. Thanks for sharing such an informative post. Keep posting
Posted by: Bass lures | 17 December 2009 at 08:16 AM
Digital cameras have come a lonnng way. I used to have one that attached to my computer by serial connection and it would take forever and a day to download my pictures :) Plus, they were grainy regardless of the size.. and I spent 5x more for it then my latest cam...
Posted by: Digital Camera Bundles | 17 December 2009 at 09:38 AM
That was simply the best post . I will keep visiting your blog so keep them coming :) .Generally I do not post on blogs, but I would like to say that this post really forced me to do so! really nice post.
Posted by: Conveyancing | 18 December 2009 at 08:35 AM
In today's New York Times, Telstar Logistics Fleet Management Officer Todd Lappin takes eight pocket-friendly point-and-shoot cameras for a test drive... so you don't have to.
Posted by: Plus Size Lingerie | 18 December 2009 at 11:06 AM
Just read this article in the New York Times. It's great to see someone make a connection between ease of use and camera performance when reviewing cameras.
Mortgage Quotes
Posted by: Mortgage Quotes | 18 December 2009 at 12:26 PM
I have a Very Nice camera .
Posted by: People Finder | 18 December 2009 at 12:28 PM
It's great to see someone make a connection between ease of use and camera performance when reviewing cameras. This is also an example where the argument can't really be made that the user will just figure it out and ease of use won't have an effect over time.
Posted by: VIP Talent Connect | 19 December 2009 at 07:24 AM
The Mini Cooper Bumper never did give names to their cars, instead consistently using letters and numbers to designate
the coupes, sedans and the SUVs. With the Mini Cooper Bumper Q45 being the flagship sedan, the Mini Cooper auto parts
found its place in the American market.The Mini Cooper Bumper never did give names to their cars,instead consistently
using letters and numbers to designate the coupes, sedans and the SUVs.
Thanks
Mini Cooper Bumper
http://www.iautobodyparts.com/ Mini Cooper Bumper
Posted by: Mini Cooper Bumper | 14 January 2010 at 12:35 AM
I gotta samsung camera its ok not the best.
Posted by: Shower Stalls | 14 January 2010 at 03:33 PM