
Today's Wall Street Journal carries a page-one article about the Boeing Large Cargo Freighter (LCF), a specially-modified Boeing 747 that will be used to haul big pieces of the company's newest airliner, the 787 Dreamliner, between manufacturing facilities in the United States and Asia. Equipped with a hinge near the tail, the rear end of the LCF swings open to swallow whole sections of 787 wing or fuselage. The WSJ adds:
The sprawling nature of the 787's supply chain makes it a challenge to move parts around in a timely fashion. The Large Cargo Freighter was built to solve this problem. [...]
The unusual craft measures 235 feet long and stands almost 71 feet tall at the tail. It's vaulted cargo hold has a capacity of 65,000 cubic feet, or about three times that of a typical 747 freighter used by big shippers such as United Parcel Service, Inc.
"Some people may say this plane is ugly. but I call it an elegant logistics solution," says Mike Bunney, the Boeing executive in charge of managing the Dreamliner's transportation system.
Indeed, there seems to be some debate over the question of whether the LCF is the ugliest aircraft ever flown. While the WSJ points to rival candidates such as Russia's Antonov An-124, Lockheed's C-5 Galaxy, and even Howard Hughes's Spruce Goose, a few obvious contenders are conspicuously missing from their list, including two planes that were also purpose-built to haul large sections of other aircraft: The Aero Spacelines Super Guppy and the Airbus Beluga.
Which is the ugliest? As with beauty, the answer lies strictly
in the eyes of the beholder.

Photoshop hack of an "Oscar Meyer LCF" (creator unknown): LINK
Boeing Large Cargo Freighter (Wikipedia entry): LINK
Boeing LCF First Flight (YouTube video): LINK
All Flickr photos of the Boeing LCF: LINK
PREVIOUSLY: The First Boeing 747
(LCF photos above by Flickr users Rick Schlamp, top; Interior photo by guns71.)
Wrong. Beauty is in the eye of the beer holder.
Posted by: Dave Ames | 09 February 2007 at 07:09 AM
It has the tail of the Boeing 747SP
Posted by: TRell Brown | 16 May 2007 at 08:47 AM
Maybe it wouldn't be so ugly if it didn't look as if the front is held on with masking tape.
And it strikes me as ridiculous to have a supply chain that requires moving such enormous parts back and forth across the Pacific. Something is very wrong when it's cheaper to make wings (or whatever) in China and then fly them (one at a time?) to the U.S. instead of just making the whole damn thing in one place.
Posted by: Christopher | 22 March 2008 at 07:48 PM
I'm not sure the international supply chain is about savings, so much as it is about sharing the wealth (and development risk).
Posted by: Kevin Armstrong | 22 December 2008 at 04:49 PM
I always thought the Barling XNBL-1 was the ugliest
Posted by: Jerry | 22 August 2009 at 09:22 AM